Versed Vaper
Survey Shows Youth Vaping' Epidemic' is Non-Existent
Home » News » Survey Shows Youth Vaping ‘Epidemic’ is Non-Existent

Survey Shows Youth Vaping ‘Epidemic’ is Non-Existent

The most recent National Youth Tobacco Survey has demonstrated that, contrary to recent claims, the ‘epidemic’ of youth vaping has seen a significant decline. The survey findings reveal many interesting points, some of which are raised as a result of selective statistical wordplay. 

Several factors come into play with this latest batch of youth vaping figures. While it should be seen as good news, the truth is that institutional myopia (or ‘short sightedness’ if you prefer) is likely to win over facts. 

What does the recently released NYTS survey actually show?

In short, the NYTS shows that youth vaping has been at its lowest level since 2014. The data shows that in 2021, 11.3% of high school students had vaped. Compared to the previous year’s survey, that is a reduction of 8.6%.

It is important to note that this figure isn’t talking exclusively about regular youth users. 

And no, it isn’t the case that over one in ten high school students are what most would describe as ‘vapers’. 

The figure quoted above is part of a greater ‘catch all’ term. The use of the word ‘ever’ is particularly important. “Ever E-cigarette use” is an important distinction to understand. “Ever” as in “have you ever?”. 

Why is this so important?

Because it implies that people who have ever tried an e-cigarette are counted among those who vape long term. This term includes a single puff ‘just to try’, as many youths are tempted to do with a whole manner of different things.

In 2018 youth vapers (as a result of ‘have you ever’ style questions)  were recorded to be 20.8%, leading Scott Gottlieb to issue an emotive statement, stating things such as:

  • “We didn’t predict what I now believe is an epidemic of e-cigarette use among teenagers.”
  • “I now have good reason to believe that it’s reached nothing short of an epidemic proportion of growth.”
  • “E-cigs have become an almost ubiquitous ‒ and dangerous ‒ trend among teens.”

According to the statistics, what prompted this declaration of an ‘epidemic’ was an increase of 9.1% in youth ‘have you ever-vapers’ from the previous year. Considering that the reported use of ‘ever vapers’ has been shown in this year’s survey to have reduced by a similar percentage, and compared to an all-time high of 27.5% in 2019, making the drop in numbers even more significant (a reduction of 16.2%) It is safe to say that the youth ‘epidemic’ is well and truly over (if it ever existed in the first place).

Percentages of percentages: the need for caution

Recent times have shown that while statistics should, in theory, be ‘black and white’, artistic license with numbers allows for almost any agenda to be pushed or promoted.

The truth is that statistics can be misleading.

Want an example?

Suppose you are fortunate enough to have a nose. In that case, you have more noses than the mean worldwide average, statistically speaking, of course.

Do you see what we mean?

The FDA has been using selective statistics and using deliberately misleading language to lead the charge against vaping.

Here’s an example:

So, there are two million youths vaping today, right?


There’s a difference between “used” as in “have you ever used?” and “using” as in “using right now”.

Fortunately, others spotted this massaging of the figures to suit an agenda:

Here’s another example:

“1 in 4 high school students reported daily use.”

So, a quarter of all high school students are vapers, right?

Wrong again. 

It is deliberately misleading, and as some pointed out, the numbers used in this context don’t actually add up.

The true statistic (as the survey actually shows) should read, “1 in 4 of the 11.3% who ever vaped reported daily use”.

25% of 11.3 is 2.8%.

2.8% of all high school students is significantly different than a statement which makes it look like a quarter of the kids are vaping.

Is 2.8% a ‘trend’? Could it be described as ‘an epidemic proportion of growth’? The answer to both of these questions is a resolute no.

Other areas where the FDA gets it wrong

The FDA’s interpretation (and biased publication) of the data could be said to be misplaced for several other reasons.

A tweet made by FDA Tobacco stated that the data was incomparable to previous studies as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic: –

There is an argument that because the kids were unable to access a standard school setting, they were not subject to the same social pressures that would normally have encouraged them to vape.


During the same period, the National Institute of Health reported that other traditional ‘teen experiments’, such as marijuana and alcohol, managed to remain unchanged.

The article itself states: –

“While pandemic-related restrictions limited social interactions, most students said they still had access to marijuana and alcohol.”

Yet no access to vapes that would appear (by the FDA’s reporting) to be utilized by the millions before the pandemic? Unlikely.

Does the FDA really promote reduction in youth vaping?

Another critical point may have gone unnoticed and revealed a flaw in the FDA’s integrity. Review the following tweet again: –

Does anything stand out?

It’s written in bold on the right and occupies the majority of the pie chart.

Disposables and pod vapes accounted for 82% of the devices reportedly used by youth.

Why is that significant?

To date, the FDA has rejected Pre-Market Tobacco Applications (PMTA’s) for over one million vaping products

The reason?

The standard response from the FDA has been as follows in its ever-growing list of Marketing Denial Orders: –

“[Products] lacked sufficient evidence demonstrating that your flavored ENDS will provide a benefit to adult users that would be adequate to outweigh the risks to youth.”

Yet, there are a select few who have been approved.

What is interesting about these products? They are producing exactly the kind of devices that are used by the overwhelming majority of youths.

When viewed as a whole, the FDA’s interpretation of the data and the subsequent decisions taken as a result seem to be misguided at best, corrupt at worst.

The bottom line

The FDA is harming public health by incorrectly cherry-picking figures, such as those given above, and publicizing these figures to misguide the public. Vaping is a safer alternative to smoking and has helped millions of adults globally quit for good.

The current wave of anti-vaping restrictions, when combined with the fact that the FDA has just approved the very type of product used by most youth vapers, is damaging adult public health by reducing the options available for people looking to quit. When you consider that the number of cigarettes sold increased from 202.9 billion to 203.7 billion in 2020, the FDA’s ‘epidemic’ may actually lie somewhere other than vaping. 

Jamie Author Pic

Jamie Gann

Jamie is a Staff Writer for Versed Vaper with nearly 10 years of industry experience. After being a smoker for several years, Jamie discovered vaping when a friend bought him his first setup. Before joining the team, he spent three years as the Manager of a local vape shop, gaining practical experience with everything from pod vapes to rebuildable atomizers. He has also previously worked as a freelance writer for other tech and vaping media websites. Jamie now uses his knowledge and experience to educate others through his reviews. You’ll find Jamie on the weekend, toolkit in hand, surrounded by box mods, wicks, and wires, trying to get the perfect cloud.

Add comment